Inflection, Sequence, and the Subject of First-Year Composition

Abstract

Rebecca Moore Howard

Syracuse University

 

The classicist Catherine Atherton has established that the grammarians of ancient Rome were tainted by their contact with the animal bodies of the children they taught. That taint still attaches to compositionists, and in an attempt to shake it, we pursue "theory-hope": the elusive assertion that our pedagogy derives from our theory. Working from a Foucaudian notion of the discursive construction of the subject combined with a traditional historical sense of causal sequence, we strive to craft our own identity, to redefine it for the institutions in which we work, to offer an irrefutable, respectable identity-product that will counteract lay constructions of our work. We keep searching for a causal, sequential relationship that will establish terms for our discipline that approximate those of colleagues in other departments.

This presentation will describe the Saussurian theory of kinetic subjectivity offered by Elizabeth Deeds Ermarth—the subject not as a discursive construction, not as realization, but as inflected potential—and apply this approach to the collective identity of composition studies, especially as that identity emerges in first-year composition curricula. Just as the "sum of speakers both contains and exceeds the language," so the sum of first-year curricula contains and exceeds the theories of its teachers. As evidence for this assertion, I will show video clips from the archives of the Syracuse University Writing Program of composition scholars talking about first-year pedagogy. In place of causal historical explanation of the place of theory in first-year composition, I will offer kinetic snapshots demonstrating that the collective identity of first-year composition "exists in sequences which have little to do with the cumulative forms of history."

Works Cited

Atherton, Catherine. "Children, Animals, Slaves and Grammar." Pedagogy and Power: Rhetorics of Classical Learning. Ed. Yun Lee Too and Niall Livingstone. New York: Cambridge UP, 1998. 214-244.

Bishop, Wendy. "Places to Stand: The Reflective Writer-Teacher-Writer in Composition." College Composition and Communication 51.1 (September 1999): 9-31.

Connors, Robert J. Composition-Rhetoric: Backgrounds, Theory, and Pedagogy. U Pittsburgh P, 1997.

Ermarth, Elizabeth Deeds. "Beyond 'The Subject': Individuality in the Discursive Condition." New Literary History 31.3 (Summer 2000): 405-419.

Howard, Rebecca Moore. "The Dialogic Function of Composition Pedagogy: Negotiating between Critical Theory and Public Values." Under Construction: Working at the Intersections of Composition Theory, Research, and Practice. Ed. Christine Farris and Chris Anson. Utah State UP, 1998. 51-64.

Jacobs, Suzie. "Reflections on Pedagogical Study." College English 59.4 (April 1997): 461-9.

Kress, Gunther. Before Writing: Rethinking the Paths to Literacy. New York: Routledge, 1997.

Lu, Min-Zhan. "Professing Multiculturalism: The Politics of Style in the Contact Zone." College Composition and Communication 45.4 (December 1994): 442-58.

Rankin, Elizabeth. Seeing Yourself as a Teacher: Conversations with Five New Teachers in a University Writing Program. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1994.

Roemer, Marjorie, Lucille M. Schultz, and Russel K. Durst. "Reframing the Great Debate on First-Year Writing." College Composition and Communication 50.3 (February 1999): 377-392.

Rose, Gillian. "As If the Mirrors Had Bled: Masculine Dwelling, Masculinist Theory and Feminist Masquerade." Bodyspace: Destabilizing Geographies of Gender and Sexuality. Ed. Nancy Duncan. New York: Routledge, 1996. 56-74.

Russell, David R. "Romantics on Writing: Liberal Culture and the Abolition of Composition Courses." Rhetoric Review 6 (Spring 1988): 132-48.

Sciappa, Edward. "The Historian as Arguer." Rhetoric Review 16.1 (Fall 1997): 36-38.

"The WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition." WPA: Writing Program Administration 23.1-2 (Fall/Winter 1999): 59-66.