« Chris's final project | Main | Becky's discussion question #2 (for in-class work only) »
January 30, 2005
Jen's discussion question #3 (for in-class work only)
Please do not respond to this question prior to our 2/3 class meeting. It is posted here for you to read and think about. In class on 2/3, one group will be assigned to respond to this. After that class meeting, you'll be able to comment here as much as you wish.
As rhetoricians, it seems as if White is not only giving us a big shot of legitimacy, but also a way to construct our own disciplinary work to account for a "lack of a subject." How might we apply White's analysis of history to work in composition/rhetoric as a field?
In class, *, *, *, and * will work together as a group to discuss this question and to post results/answers to the blog. After class, other class members may contribute comments, as well.
Posted by senioritis at January 30, 2005 08:03 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://writing.syr.edu/move/mt-tb.cgi/827