« Can't find my own stuff! | Main | Course project proposal (02112005) »
February 11, 2005
Geyer Project Proposal
My final project will be to begin the process of editing Porter Perrin's dissertation, with a view to finishing that project after the course has concluded.
I see this project as one of historicism, where my attempt will be to situate Perrin and his work in historical and disciplinary context. The dissertation, titled "The Teaching of Rhetoric in American Colleges Before 1750," is the primary text for the project. It will reflect both what Perrin saw as important in the early history of rhetoric instruction, as well as what was important in his time (the 1930s specifically).
The primary research question will be, "what would a twenty-first century student or practitioner in the field of composition need to know to understand Perrin's dissertation and its relevance?" Some supporting questions are:
- What does the reader need to know about the author? (This is the biographical part.)
- What allusions, literary, social, or otherwise, shape the meaning of the text?
- With whom was Perrin working/studying at the University of Chicago? How, if at all, do the values or theories of those people influence the text?
- How much of Perrin's dissertation work is revealed, followed, or departed from in his later work?
- How widely used were Porter's Writer's Guide, Reference Handbook, Index, and Guide used?
- What other information about Perrin's work in the field is important and relevant?
My goal will be to write an introduction to the dissertation, along with such footnotes as seem appropriate for the text itself. If the project were to advance to publication, i would anticipate a bibliography being included.
Preliminary Bibliography:
Brown, Leonard Stanley, and Porter G. Perrin. A Quarto of Modern Literature. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1935.
Perrin, Porter G. An Index to English. Chicago: Scott, Foresman, 1939.
Perrin, Porter G., with Karl W. Dykema. Writer's Guide and Index to English. 3rd ed. Chicago: Scott, Foresman, 1959.
These are the editions available at Bird Library. I would like to try to obtain different editions of these works from ILLIAD. I'm interested in learning more about Karl Dykema and his involvement with Perrin, since he appears more than once in newer editions of Perrin's older texts. Also, John Breretson placed Perrin at the University of Washington in an administrative capacity. It's possible they have some of his papers or other documents that reveal aspects of his work. I will contact both the English department and the library to find out.
Other potential works (final ones to be included will be based on availability as well as content):
Perrin, Porter G. "For a Responsible Rhetoric." College English 10.4 (1949): 222-223.
Perrin, Porter G. "Freshman Composition and the Tradition of Rhetoric." Perspectives on English: Essays to Honor W. Wilbur Hatfield. Ed. Robert C. Pooley. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; National Council of Teachers of English, 1960. 119-132.
Perrin, Porter G., George H. Smith, and Jim W. Corder. Handbook of Current English. 3rd ed. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, 1968.
Perrin, Porter G., and William Kelley Wright. The History of Modern Philosophy. Hanover, NH, 1917.
Perrin, Porter G. "Maximum Essentials in Composition." College English 8.7 (1947): 352-360.
Perrin, Porter G. "Notes on Lectures by Porter G. Perrin." Transcribed by Emily Ann Beatty. Publication of the Fifth Workshop in Basic Communication, University of Denver, 1947. Ed. Thelma R. Sherman. U Denver P, 1947. 6-30.
Perrin, Porter G., and George H. Smith. The Perrin-Smith Handbook of Current English. Chicago: Scott, Foresman, 1955.
Perrin, Porter G. "A Realistic Philosophy for Teachers of English." College English 9.5 (1948): 256-264.
Perrin, Porter G. Reference Handbook of Grammar and Usage. New York: Morrow, 1972.
Perrin, Porter G. "Text and Reference Books in Rhetoric before 1750." Chicago, 1940.
Platt, Harrison Gray, and Porter G. Perrin. Current Expressions of Fact and Opinion. Chicago: Scott, Foresman, 1941.
Warnock, Robert, Porter G. Perrin, Frank Earl Ward, and Harrison Gray Platt. Using Good English: A Textbook and Workbook in Writing, Reading, and Speaking. Chicago: Scott, Foresman, 1944.
Posted by cageyer at February 11, 2005 07:59 AM
Comments
There's another resource available to you: Colgate University. Perrin taught there, and once you've got this proposal in final draft, it's worth a trip to Hamilton, I suspect. Make an appointment in advance with a reference librarian who can help you find any syllabi, memos, etc., that he might have contributed. University catalogs can probably help you establish when he was there. I think his other academic post was at U Dub! —yes, it was. I just checked my commonplace book entry on Perrin (which I've now emailed to you).
A potentially very valuable way to contextualize Perrin's work for compositionists, most of whom today have never heard of him, is that he directed Kitzhaber's dissertation. That will get people's attention--especially if you can find some other well-known people in the Chicago trail of influences. I think you're going to have fun in the detective work on this guy.
I particularly urge that you press and refine this question as you work: " - What does the reader need to know about the author? (This is the biographical part.)" What would happen if for the moment you reframed the question this way: "What do today's compositionists have to gain by a better understanding of Porter Perrin's work"?
For me, there's also an underlying, important, inescapable question that you should just keep in mind as you work: "What do compositionists have to gain from the recovery of a mid-century white guy's work?" A lot of important recovery work is being done on the scholarship and teaching of women and people of color. Since the white guys so completely dominated comp studies at mid-century, why would anyone want to resurrect another one of them now? Obviously that's a very raced question, but as you know, for me, almost all questions connected with literacy are raced questions, and anyone undertaking the retrieval of some dead white guy shouldn't dodge the question. And as you know, it's my hunch that there's a lot to gain from shedding light on the work of Porter Perrin. But regardless of whether you overtly address the race-&-gender questions in your research reports, you'll benefit from always having them in mind. Like, for example—ooh! ooh! What if (eventually) you looked at his work in the context of what was going on in the CLA journal at that time? Hmm? Etc.
Posted by: senioritis at February 11, 2005 08:38 PM