« Project Proposal | Main | The Emplotment of Parks »

February 09, 2005

Proposing, Pondering, Preposterous

Okay Senioritis. I’ve decided. The bib is pretty long, and I know it needs more focus, but here goes.

I've decided to research: 20th Century African American Women Rhetoricians and their Contributions to Composition Studies. My reasons for wanting to take on such a task are simple. First, I don’t know enough about the contributions that African American women have made in the field of composition studies. Since being introduced to the polemical underpinnings of composition and rhetoric, I’m not surprised that this arena is dominated by people, who are not of color. I know that there is information that I need to know, realize, and hold true, but, I’m not really interested in taking up a cause I’m not feeling. Thus, I’d like to know what it is that I am being birth into by situating Royster and Smitherman in the field of composition. I want to know whether other scholars have embraced their arguments, in particular, what Royster and Smitherman espouse about language, and how that is represented in pedagogy. I want to know how they execute their research, and what methods they use. Since these women are writing in present day, it would also be interesting to survey their writings, collectively, to identify areas of composition to which they ascribe. I want to present a picture and mood of the attitude of composition when they wrote specific works. This constitutes historical work because the focus would not be a posthumous account of the contributions that African American women have made to composition studies, but a contemporary account. This would permit me to access primary sources by way of interview, and it would allow me to survey a specific period, locating what may have helped to influence how they couched language and pedagogy. I am concerned that this proposal is too broad and needs more focus. I am also concerned that I will not have enough time to complete this project. I am also concerned that "language" is not the word I'm looking for to describe what I want to review.

So, as a very preliminary bibliography, I'm thinking:

Potter, J. and M. Mulkay. "Scientists' Interview Talk: Interviews as a Technique for Revealing Participants' Interpretative Practices." The Research Interview: Uses and Approaches. Ed. M. Brenner, J. Brown, and D. Canter. New York: Academic P, 1985. 247-271.

Fink, Arlene, and Jacqueline Kosecoff. How to Conduct Surveys: A Step-by-Step Guide. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985.

Smitherman, Geneva. Interview. (Before this project is complete [2005]).

Jackson, Austin, and Geneva Smitherman. “ ‘Black People Tend to Talk Eubonics': Race and Curricular Diversity in Higher Education.” Strategies for Teaching First-Year Composition. Ed. Duane Roen, Veronica Pantoja, Lauren Yena, Susan K. Miller, and Eric Waggoner. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 2002. 46-50.

Makoni, Sinfree, Geneva Smitherman, Arthur K. Spears, and Arnetha F. Ball. Black Linguistics: Language, Society and Politics in Africa and the Americas. New York: Routledge, 2003.

Rose, Shirley K. “Two Disciplinary Narratives for Non-Standard English in the Classroom: Citation Histories of Shaughnessy's Errors and Expectations and Smitherman's Talkin' and Testifyin'.” History, Reflection, and Narrative: The Professionalization of Composition 1963-1983. Eds. Mary Rosner, Beth Boehm, and Debra Journet. Greenwich, CT: Ablex, 1998. 187-204.

Smitherman, Geneva. “ ‘The Blacker the Berry, the Sweeter the Juice’: African American Student Writers.” The Need for Story: Cultural Diversity in Classroom and Community. Ed. Anne Haas Dyson and Celia Genishi. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English, 1994. 80-101.

Smitherman, Geneva. “CCCC's Role in the Struggle for Language Rights.” College Composition and Communication. 50.3 (February 1999): 349-376.

Smitherman, Geneva. “The Historical Struggle for Language Rights in CCCC.” Language Diversity in the Classroom: From Intention to Practice. Ed. Geneva Smitherman and Victor Villanueva. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2003. 7-39.

Smitherman, Geneva. “Language and Democracy in the USA and the RSA.” Language Ideologies: Critical Perspectives on the Official English Movement. Vol. 2. Ed. Roseann Dueñas González. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, 2001. 316-345.

Smitherman, Geneva. “Language Policy and Classroom Practices.” Making the Connection: Language and Academic Achievement among African American Students. Ed. Carolyn Temple Adger, Donna Christian, and Orland Taylor. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, 1999.

Smitherman, Geneva. “Meditations on Language, Pedagogy, and a Life of Struggle.” Rhetoric and Ethnicity. Ed. Keith Gilyard and Vorris Nunley. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 2004. 3-14.

Smitherman, Geneva. Talkin and Testifyin: The Language of Black America. Detroit: Wayne State UP, 1977, 1986.

Smitherman-Donaldson, Geneva. “Toward a National Public Policy on Language.” College English 49 (1987): 29-36.

Royster, Jacqueline Jones. Interview. (Before this project is complete [2005]).

Royster, Jacqueline Jones. “When the First Voice You Hear Is Not Your Own.” College Composition and Communication 47.1 (February 1996): 29-40.

Royster, Jacqueline Jones, and Jean C. Williams. “History in the Spaces Left: African American Presence and Narratives of Composition Studies.” College Composition and Communication. 50.4 (June 1999): 563-585.

Royster, Jacqueline Jones, Anne Bradford Warner. “Saga of the Dragon Slayers or Perspectives on Teaching Writing at Spellman College.” Teaching Writing at Historically Black colleges and Universities. eds. David G. Lanoue and Vivian A. Wilson. New Orleans: Southern Education Foundation, 1988. 25-30.

Royster, Jacqueline Jones. “In Search of Ways in: Reflection and Response.” Feminine Principles and Women’s Experience in American Composition and Rhetoric. eds. Louise W. Phelps and Janet Emig. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1995. 385-392.

Royster, Jacqueline Jones and Rebecca Greenberg Taylor. “Construction Teacher Identity in the Basic Writing Classroom.” Journal of Basic Writing. 16.1. 1997: 27-50.

Posted by aljeffer at February 9, 2005 10:09 PM

Comments

Wow! Aleisha, you are, as we say in Spanglish, A LOCA! But, I admire your ambition! ;)

Posted by: Denise at February 9, 2005 10:44 PM

Okay Denise. I don't know what A LOCA means. Can you expound on that? :-)

I know it's a bit much, but I'm not sure of how I should go about doing this or what exactly it is I'm looking for. I hope that senioritis or somebody will help me narrow the focus.

Posted by: aj at February 9, 2005 10:51 PM

I'm familiar with some of our suggest sources, but I have another one I think you have to look at to get this started: Elaine Richardson, African American Literacies. I'll bring my copy next week if you want. Richardson very definitely takes up Smitherman's work on language, and combines it with James Gee's work on literacies. I found it very useful and a great resource. As bonus, Elaine is accessible for an interview. She and Adam (who probably also has her book on his shelf) were classmates, and she was here last year for a symposium.

Also, read the on-line edition of CCC Vol. 19, No. 5, December 1968. There are four or five great articles in that edition that talk about the presence/absence of African-American (and Native-American) voices in higher ed.

What I read in your proposal is the "research" part, but the only real questions I see developing are what are you getting into, and how (or if) you could (or should) duplicate their research (presumably with students?). Your description suggests you want to situate these women in their historical moment(s). Is that right? Personally, I think the more interesting history to unfold would be how particular people of color, especially women, gained national recognition and audience in this field. That may be what you are aiming for, and I may just be saying it differently.

I'll be glad to talk it through with you if I can help. :)

Posted by: Chris Geyer at February 10, 2005 04:29 PM

Chris-

Yes. I don't want to duplicate their work, but I am very curious about how they have gotten recognition and acceptances in the field. But on the other hand, I’m also curious about how what tools, methods, methodologies they have used to perform the type of work that they do. I did talk to Adam and he mentioned Elaine. I tried to borrow that book from him last semester, but he had loaned it out to another student. I would love to borrow yours.

So it seems as if Royster would not be a comparable choice to survey with Smitherman. It would be nice to work with two women whose work seem to parallel in some way. As I began to take a closer look at the sources I had listed, I was beginning to wonder how I would make the connections.

I would love to talk with you sometime next week. What does your calendar look like? We can take that part off line. Shoot me an email.

Thanks again.

Posted by: aj at February 10, 2005 04:53 PM

I haven't read Richardson's book yet. Is it comp history?

Posted by: senioritis at February 10, 2005 09:36 PM

Richardson's book discusses composition to some degree, so I guess so. In fact, here is the table of contents and some other parts, as provided by google. The forward is by Smitherman.

If I move in the direction that Chris suggests, which seems doable, I would need to revamp my list of sources.

Posted by: aj at February 10, 2005 11:45 PM

As soon as you can, you should revise this proposal. It still needs more specificity. Listing research questions is probably a good idea at this point. Chris's suggested question is a good one, and if it's one that, on consideration, you decide you want to take up, you'll have to decide whether it's a research question for right now or whether it's a question for later—perhaps not even during this course. Chris herself is doing a project of that sort, one in which her work for 611 is the beginning of a larger project that she might choose to pursue. So anyhow, I'd like to see your list of research questions for this project in this course.

Posted by: senioritis at February 12, 2005 06:40 AM