« Hangover | Main | Ivory-billed update »
April 30, 2005
Intersections
I'm blogging about faculty contempt for their students; Mike is blogging about the Keynesian-neoclassical economics that would prevent us from recognizing student writing as capital. Which, to my way of thinking, offers another explanation for that professorial contempt for students—and another twist on Bruce Horner's contention that faculty think of their writing, not their teaching, as their "work."
*Horner, Bruce. Terms of Work for Composition: A Materialist Critique. Ithaca, NY: SUNY P, 2000.
**Still pretty clueless about finding the URLs for trackback pings; I'm stumped by Mike's platform, alas.
Posted by senioritis at April 30, 2005 09:43 AM
Comments
It's the URL for the word "trackback" at the bottom of the individual post. One of these days when I get some time, I'll do some tweaking to the interface, and remember to make the trackback thingy a little more evident. As far as the student-bashing goes -- yeah, I don't like it either, especially not when I catch myself doing it. But I'd want to carefully separate out "bashing" from complaining about one's day, of whom students (and colleagues) will necessarily be a part. And I recall being a rather rotten undergraduate in certain courses; sometimes, all that ego, angst, and self-centeredness so typical to teenagers does, indeed, merit complaint. I think the thing of it is that teachers talking about students -- because of the power relationships -- is always gonna be weird and possibly uncomfortable, whether it's bashing-style blame of students or conversion-narrative praise of students.
Posted by: Mike at May 2, 2005 01:14 AM
A good point (& thanx for trackback info). There's a difference between griping about students (I do plenty of that, without hesitation) and making fun of them. So my term "student-bashing" is too general; what I'm really talking about is the derision of students.
Posted by: senioritis at May 2, 2005 08:07 AM